Subscriber Services
Weather

Monday, February 12, 2007

Poor little rich baby

The continuing soap opera that was (and is) Anna Nicole Smith's life continues with the fight over her daughter's future. What a pathetic sight! And how sleazy of all of us -- media and audience alike -- as we run front-page stories and tune into breaking bulletins on coroner's reports, paternity tests etc etc.!
This little girl doesn't stand a chance for a normal life. All the inherited wealth in the world won't buy her what she needs most, and the sad part is that she is a complete innocent in all of this. The judge who decides her fate will need the wisdom of Solomon.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

True....true...

The saddest part of all this is that there are MANY little babies and children out there that are in need of a loving home.

There seems to be a conga-line of potential fathers to this little girl -- perhaps because of the potential for a big pay-day (if the courts rule in her mother's favor).

It would be interesting to see whether these guys would be clamoring as much if there was no money involved.

In the meantime - there are beautiful children that need to be fostered or adopted by loving families. Maybe that is the story that should be on the front page.

9:42 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is such a sad story for that poor little baby. She started her life in the worst possible circumstances and things have only become worse since then....

If things work out so that she is given to her grandmother for raising,it would be the best thing for her.

All those men clamoring for the baby are only interested in the money.

Let's see how this plays out -- it is indeed a tragedy.

9:21 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I disagree that the child's grandmother would be the best one to raise the child. Evidently, if Mrs. Arthur is 55 as indicated in the news, she was only 16 when her own daughter was born. Consider Anna Nicole's (Vickie Lynn) life style. Do you really think her mother would do a better job the second time around?

12:10 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home